Johnson’s power safety technique received’t deliver down our eye-watering heating payments | Eleanor Salter

Sharing is caring!

At final, the energy security strategy has been revealed, after weeks of hedging, briefing and delays. The unique goals of the technique, which was initially promised on 7 March, had been worthy: to confront rocketing power payments and transition away from Russian fossil fuels after the invasion of Ukraine.

There was additionally hope within the local weather world that the technique would go additional and quicker within the transition to a zero-carbon economic system. The cost of renewables has tumbled, and the UK’s leaky housing inventory is crying out for retrofitting. This was a chance for an pressing response each to the local weather and value of dwelling crises.

However for one thing that was motivated by a battle and an power disaster, the headline insurance policies of the ensuing doc strikingly fail to deal with both. One of many cornerstone points is timescale: the technique is huge on infrastructure commitments resembling new nuclear energy crops and offshore wind farms, which received’t be totally operational for years, if not a long time. Radical reform of the planning system to permit extra onshore wind, one of many quickest and most cost-effective short-term salves to excessive power payments, is absent. Instead there’s a milquetoast commitment to “consulting on creating partnerships for a restricted variety of supportive communities”.

Months after Cop26, the technique has dedicated to licensing and drilling for oil and fuel within the North Sea. Its local weather ambitions are subsequently deeply questionable. The vast majority of this oil is tagged for export; as Kwasi Kwarteng, the enterprise secretary, pointed out, home manufacturing received’t handle power payments however will solely assist fossil gasoline executives get richer. With out nationalisation, new oil and fuel might be bought on the market charge.

Shell made a profit of $19.3bn (£14.7bn) final yr. Different power firms have additionally been raking it in, benefiting from the extortionate worth of fuel. As a substitute of imposing a windfall tax on these oil and fuel firms that would assist fund power saving measures, the federal government’s technique does the exact reverse. New oil and fuel may blow a gigantic gap within the UK’s carbon funds. Licensing new exploration is a brazen transfer even for the Johnson authorities, committing to grease and fuel in the identical week because the devastating IPCC report confirmed current and deliberate fossil gasoline infrastructure will far exceed the 1.5C restrict.

This rushed power safety technique, which is prone to be incompatible with the federal government’s different acknowledged local weather targets of web zero by 2050, is what occurs once you push insurance policies by means of the bizarre prism of the Tory get together. Though the Johnson administration is not any stranger to dysfunction, producing the power safety technique has been chaos on a brand new scale.

Over the previous few weeks, the prime minister has been trying to place out a number of fires throughout his get together. Headlines have been peppered with briefings and counter-briefings. On 23 March, the Guardian trailed that Johnson would champion onshore wind in defiance of his Nimby backbenchers. A mere fortnight later, he apparently backed away from onshore wind after over 100 backbenchers lobbied towards the coverage.

Because of this, the brand new technique has one thing for everybody, however pleases nobody. A brand new survey into fracking has been ordered as bait to the Tory proper, with Kwarteng claiming the federal government might be “guided by the science on shale fuel”. However little has modified within the UK’s geology because the moratorium on fracking was enforced in 2019.

One other drawback with this technique is deeply acquainted. Whereas it presents a bundle of guarantees, there is no such thing as a cash to again these up. The important thing phrase to look out for is “as much as”. Nuclear power may present “as much as 24GW by 2050”. The federal government will “look to extend the UK’s present 14GW of photo voltaic capability which may develop as much as 5 instances by 2035”. Even “we wish to see as much as 5GW from floating offshore wind”. These aren’t targets, they’re imprecise intimations.

The power technique is silent on one elementary problem – lowering power demand. Widely reported wrangling between the Treasury, the Division for Enterprise, Power and Industrial Technique and Quantity 10 is guilty. Power effectivity measures are the quickest and most cost-effective method to decrease power payments and finish reliance on Russian fossil fuels. They’re additionally crucial for decarbonisation. However the Treasury blocked a proposal to broaden the Power Firm Obligation scheme, which offers insulation measures to low-income households. This spat appeared petty to the purpose of ridicule: departments are bickering over a £200m top-up to an current coverage when an infinite, nationwide retrofit marketing campaign might be each crucial and inevitable as our planet warms.

The issue just isn’t solely of ideological distinction, but in addition ideological vacuum. Most civil servants had no thought a method was even within the pipeline when Johnson promised it 4 weeks in the past. However a frenzy in Whitehall to make up coverage on the hoof has turn into a typical trait of this authorities, whose manifesto was slender and whose get together consensus is messy on nearly each problem.

Coordination throughout the cupboard is past Johnson’s attain, partly as a result of he’s weak and partly as a result of he doesn’t know what he stands for. In 2012, he called wind generators “white satanic mills” whose “collective oomph wouldn’t pull the pores and skin off a rice pudding”. Now, he’s blowing laborious for offshore wind. Johnson finds himself up towards a well-liked, anti-spend chancellor and the Net Zero Scrutiny Group. Regardless of his 80-seat majority, he’s unable to persuade his backbenchers of the necessity for swift commitments to the cost-of-living and local weather crises, while we profession in the direction of 3.2C warming. He has to squeeze all the pieces previous a reticent chancellor and a celebration whose backbenchers are a decade behind public opinion.

The result’s a mash of promised insurance policies which don’t sort out the difficulty of power safety. With out severely considering a discount in our power demand or fast-tracking renewables, the technique merely doesn’t handle what it was created for within the first place – ending dependence on a belligerent Russia, and bringing down eye-watering payments. As a substitute, the ragged Tory consensus is to ship high-intensity infrastructure at some indefinite level sooner or later, and a failure to rise to the urgency required on power for each folks and planet.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

sixteen − fifteen =

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

You may also like

Read More