Greater than $1bn of Coalition’s local weather funding might go to fossil gas tasks, evaluation finds | Fossil fuels

Sharing is caring!

The Coalition has introduced greater than $1bn in local weather funding that would go to fossil gas developments since setting a goal of reaching web zero emissions by 2050 final yr, an evaluation has discovered.

The majority of the funding promised through the election marketing campaign has been to develop “clear” hydrogen – a time period usually used to consult with hydrogen made with gas, a fossil fuel – and carbon seize and storage (CCS), which has had little success thus far however oil and gasoline executives say will need to play a massive role if the world is to slash emissions.

The progressive thinktank the Australia Institute tallied pledges to develop clear hydrogen and CCS together with $300m for the Northern Territory, $158m in Queensland, and at the least $140m for Western Australia. As much as $40m has been promised to assist gasoline big Woodside construct a CCS hub within the Pilbara.

The institute’s local weather and power program director, Richie Merzian, mentioned it illustrated the extent to which the federal government was supporting fossil gas industries whereas promising to act on the climate crisis.

Merzian mentioned hydrogen made with gasoline might solely have low emissions if CCS proved economically viable, and that had not but occurred at scale regardless of billions of {dollars} in commitments from Australian governments.

He mentioned clear hydrogen was “a advertising time period, not a local weather answer”, and that different international locations have been placing significant support into zero-emissions inexperienced hydrogen made with renewable power.

“If hydrogen is meant to be a local weather answer and act as an alternative choice to fossil fuels, it may possibly’t be based mostly on fossil fuels in any manner,” he mentioned.

Oil and gasoline executives expressed optimism at a convention in Brisbane this week about CCS and clear hydrogen permitting the business to expand while trying to reduce emissions.

The convention heard Australia was house to the largest CCS challenge on this planet – Chevron’s Gorgon improvement within the Pilbara, which the corporate says has captured and injected underground about 6m tonnes of emissions since belatedly beginning operation almost three years in the past. To place that into context, Australia alone emits about 500m tonnes a yr.

The Coalition didn’t reply to questions, together with on why it believed investing clear hydrogen made with gasoline and CCS tasks would result in important emissions reductions.

It has beforehand mentioned it was “strongly dedicated to a gas-fired restoration”, together with opening up the doubtless huge Beetaloo gas basin within the NT, and has argued that assist for hydrogen and CCS can cut back emissions whereas creating jobs. It has dismissed a warning from the Worldwide Power Company that no new oil and gas fields should be opened if the world is to maintain the opportunity of limiting world heating to 1.5C alive.

The Australia Institute estimated the federal government had dedicated as much as $1.7bn in local weather funding that would go to fossil gas tasks since Scott Morrison set a web zero goal in October. The pledges included:

The institute additionally included the November announcement of a $500m “low emissions technology commercialisation fund” to again authorities priority areas, which embrace hydrogen, CCS, power storage and “extremely low-cost photo voltaic”. The way forward for the proposed fund is unsure: the federal government promised laws within the final time period of parliament to arrange the fund as a part of the nationwide inexperienced financial institution, the Clear Power Finance Company (CEFC), however no invoice was launched.

Labor backed all power commitments within the funds, and has matched authorities inexperienced hydrogen commitments through the marketing campaign, together with as much as $44.9m for a development in Queensland, however has expressed scepticism concerning the power of presidency assist for CCS. With the crossbench, Labor opposed authorities makes an attempt to re-cast two clear power companies, the CEFC and the Australian Renewable Power Company, so they may fund CCS and gasoline tasks.

A Labor spokesperson mentioned it could assist “any emissions discount expertise that stacks up scientifically and commercially”.

“What Labor doesn’t assist is the diversion of scarce renewable power funding to non-renewables, which the federal government has constantly tried to do,” they mentioned.

Coal and gasoline proposals would blow emissions goal

A separate evaluation examined what it could imply for Australia’s nationwide emissions if all new coal and gasoline tasks on a authorities division checklist of proposed developments went forward.

The chief govt and senior scientist at Local weather Analytics, Invoice Hare, discovered they might add 8.3% to Australia’s annual emissions by 2030.

It could imply the nation would in all probability simply miss the Coalition’s 2030 goal of a 26% to twenty-eight% reduce in emissions in contrast with 2005 ranges except new insurance policies have been launched. Labor has a target of a 43% cut over the timeframe.

Signal as much as obtain the highest tales from Guardian Australia each morning

If all emissions from the coal and gasoline developments have been counted, together with these from burning the fossil fuels after they have been bought abroad, Hare mentioned it could add the equal of 170% of Australia’s present emissions to the worldwide whole.

He mentioned whereas not all the greater than 100 coal and gasoline proposals have been prone to go forward, their potential emissions can be a big challenge for the subsequent authorities.

“The outlook for Australia if these tasks will not be rolled again is absolutely fairly disastrous,” Hare mentioned. “It could add to our pariah standing internationally.”

The Coalition and Labor say new coal and gasoline developments ought to be allowed to go forward whereas companies wish to make investments and in the event that they meet native environmental requirements.

The Greens desire a moratorium on all new coal and gasoline developments and thermal coal to be phased out by 2030.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

11 + eight =

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

You may also like

Read More